“So what are the problems of relying too heavily on stories? You view your life like this instead of the mess that it is or it ought to be. But more specifically, I think of a few major problems when we think too much in terms of narrative. First, narratives tend to be too simple, for the point of a narrative is to strip it away, not just into 18 minutes, but most narratives you can present in a sentence or two. When you strip away detail, you tend to tell stories in terms of good versus evil, whether it’s a story about your own life or a story about politics. I know some things actually are good versus evil, we all know this, right? But I think, as a general rule, we’re too inclined to tell the good versus evil story. As a simple rule of thumb, just imagine that every time you’re telling a good versus evil story, you’re basically lowering your IQ by ten points or more.”
“A life! You know what that is? It’s the shit that happens when you’re waiting for moments that never come.”
Wenig hervortreten, viel leisten, mehr sein als scheinen.
Alfred Graf von Schlieffen
Avoid the spotlight, work hard, and be more than you seem.
Overall I thought The Crown’s first season was good – it’s hard for me to dislike a period drama that takes pains to stay accurate. The clip below was probably my favorite few minutes in the whole season. It’s heavy stuff – and in reality I imagine the concept of a divine responsibility isn’t a new one to a new queen. Something this profound has to be communicated early if not often. Either way, great scene.
“carpetbaggers and parvenus”
“England expects that every man will do his duty” – the signal given by Admiral Horatio Nelson, 1st Viscount Nelson from his flagship HMS Victory as the Battle of Trafalgar was about to commence – is perhaps the most well known quote about duty. If you went to a southern military college, “Duty is the sublimest word in our language. Do your duty in all things. You cannot do more; you should never wish to do less.” by General Robert E. Lee comes readily to mind as well. They speak of duty through a 19th century military concept of honor. But there are other ways of looking at it – such as these:
Make it a point to do something every day that you don’t want to do. This is the golden rule for acquiring the habit of doing your duty without pain.
A man who becomes conscious of the responsibility he bears toward a human being who affectionately waits for him, or to an unfinished work, will never be able to throw away his life. He knows the “why” for his existence, and will be able to bear almost any “how.”
Victor Frankl – Man’s Search For Meaning, 1946
Do not confuse “duty” with what other people expect of you; they are utterly different. Duty is a debt you owe to yourself to fulfill obligations you have assumed voluntarily. Paying that debt can entail anything from years of patient work to instant willingness to die. Difficult it may be, but the reward is self-respect.
But there is no reward at all for doing what other people expect of you, and to do so is not merely difficult, but impossible. It is easier to deal with a footpad than it is with the leech who wants “just a few minutes of your time, please — this won’t take long.” Time is your total capital, and the minutes of your life are painfully few. If you allow yourself to fall into the vice of agreeing to such requests, they quickly snowball to the point where these parasites will use up 100 percent of your time — and squawk for more!
So learn to say No — and to be rude about it when necessary.
Otherwise you will not have time to carry out your duty, or to do your own work, and certainly no time for love and happiness. The termites will nibble away your life and leave none of it for you.
(This rule does not mean that you must not do a favor for a friend, or even a stranger. But let the choice be yours. Don’t do it because it is “expected” of you.)
Robert A. Heinlein – Time Enough for Love, 1973
The destiny of mankind is not decided by material computation. When great causes are on the move in the world …we learn that we are spirits, not animals, and that something is going on in space and time, and beyond space and time, which, whether we like it or not, spells duty.
Winston S. Churchill – Radio address to the US, June 1941
Never mind your happiness; do your duty.
Peter F. Drucker
Peter F. Drucker’s The Effective Executive is a goldmine of valuable management advice. Perhaps the meta-narrative of the book is an ethos for executives – to focus on those areas where they can provide the greatest amount of help to the organization. Here he talks about how to connect one’s own specialties to the larger organization:
The only meaningful definition of a “generalist” is a specialist who can relate his own small area to the universe of knowledge. Maybe a few people have knowledge in more than a few small areas. But that does not make them generalists; it makes them specialists in several areas. And one can be just as bigoted in three areas as in one. The man, however, who takes responsibility for his contribution will relate his narrow area to a genuine whole. He may never himself be able to integrate a number of knowledge areas into one. But he soon realizes that he has to learn enough of the needs, the directions, the limitations, and the perceptions of others to enable them to use his own work. Even if this does not make him appreciate the richness and the excitement of diversity, it will give him immunity against the arrogance of the learned—that degenerative disease which destroys knowledge and deprives it of beauty and effectiveness.
History, like any other human endeavor, is subject to human error and the human tendency to change the story to suit one’s interests. The following are a number of quotes taken from the section The Exploration of History.
Nothing can deceive like a document.
After twenty years’ experience of such work, pure documentary history seems to me akin to mythology.
Many are the gaps to be found in official archives, token of documents destroyed later to conceal what might impair a commander’s reputation.
The study of war history is especially apt to dispel any illusions—about the reliability of men’s testimony and their accuracy in general, even apart from the shaping of facts to suit the purposes of propaganda.
A sound rule of historical evidence is that while assertions should be treated with critical doubt, admissions are likely to be reliable.
Why Don’t We Learn From History, Basil H. Liddell Hart, p27-29
This seems disheartening if you’re trying to reconstruct actual events from historical documents. How is one to tell which account is the truthful one – and how to reconcile conflicting and both seemingly plausible explanations?